Careful & Casual Speech.

Careful Speech (pl. Mowa Staranna) means consciously adjusting speech to laws of proper speech, but without extreme exaggeration.

Casual Speech (pl. Mowa Potoczna) is also correct, but more of a free-form.

This blog's author tries to follow rules of his own Grammar & Rules of Spoken Speech, so it's both Careful & Casual Speech, depending on a perspective.

Beneficial Speech & Styles.

There are many speech styles, one can develop various of it's qualities, grammars parts & forms as one needs.

My speech is written or told in casual (not too formal but elegant, based on cause & effect law called 'karma' in Buddhism), international english language can be summarized as:
- Abstract (generalized & on topic, as seen from above, from bird's flight),
- Essentional (minimal amount of words, but not too few - that summarize what i wish to say. It skips details, and follows plan of speech resulting from analysis),
- Careful (great care & attempt at perfection is given to a precision & tools of achieving the precision of speech),
- Lyrical (my speech uses poetic metaphors to say more in less words, more beautifully as well, evoking feelings - mostly beneficial),
- Terse (using least amount of symbols, yet with the precise meaning).

i also have Polish written & spoken language, but i think mostly in international english way - i am a transliterate, for i spent great deal of my life with the internet, enligh words & international communities. My thinking in Polish language shares it's qualities with my english written speech, but is not so much developed.

When write about other people's words, i try to always clearly state where it is a precise quote, when it's paraphrase (transforming words to speak using one's words, often giving it another meaning), or translation attempt (translation is often imprecise with carrying exact meanings as different nations, cultures & people think & feel differently on the same words).

i think that communicating in the Internet or using other international means is a great challenge - because of high risk of being misunderstood if one is not careful).

i think that 'authoring' - transforming someone's words then claiming that someone else is author of these is seen too often, not only in the internet. i think this can be done if author agrees to use his name under transformed words, but without such permission it is often too a harmful manipulation.

Integral Speech.

Integral speech & it's usefulness.

Integral speech is speech that is internally consistent, that joins many topics, arguments, forms of expression.

It's easier to speak integrally for oneself, but to join many of different opinions of different people or groups is much more difficult.

It's useful when preparing expression form to tell something to a significiant group of people, representing opinions of many as well.

i think this has uses in Politics, Public Speeches, Arts, Sales, etc ...


How to speak integrally?

i think philosophy & arts can help with that.

i think that expression form should be short, true, strictly to the point.

i think that message should not contain any of contradicting (opposing) arguments in itself.

i think that message should contain as little as possible of countercurrent (leading to opposing conclusions) arguments as well.


Choosing Arguments.

'Symbol is never explained forever.' - Carl Jung.

Symbols represent ideas, are arguments as well.

Word, images, other expression forms might be symbols to be used or not.

Different people react differently, research might be neccessary to check which of similar arguments a target group prefers.

Images or words, etc ... might be given to a tested people's group(s), which image or word they like more?

We can draw components (symbols, arguments) & logic arrows (logical extensions from one symbol to another) as in a graph (important data structure in a computer sciences).




a 'Graph',
a 'Graph' of Arguments' Popularity.

if we wish to say argument 9,
let's take care of supporting arguments as well,
... it's 11 & 8 in this case.

for 11 we should also take care of 5 & 7,
for 8 we should also take care of 7 & 3,
for 5 we should take care of 11 as well.

if we wish to say 10,
let's notice,
argument 10 supports itself,
perhaps we should speak it many of a time.
it's supporting arguments are 11, 10 & 3.

this 'graph' is a 'directed graph',
for there are 'arrows' at the 'ends of the lines',

there are 'cycles' in this 'graph',
11->5->11 & 10->10 in this case,
... arguments we should speak many of a time, perhaps.


We can see which arguments benefit us more, which less ... when considering a group & us.

The same components might have different destinations depending on a target group they model.

Arrows & components might be labelled with 'popularity score', a number next to a component or arrow ... or perhaps a color as well.


See also if you wish or need, ... : Modelling Speech Forms (a computer sciences article).


(to be continued later, if needed or neccessary).